As is often noted, the map is not the territory.[1] But what is usually missed is that, when we attempt to think of how they differ, we most often slip into specifics such that what we really compare is not the map with the territory, but the thing first recognized to be a map with a mental map of the territory.

Our efforts to think about how models differ from reality are usually likewise characterized by comparisons between some model and some other model not recognized to be a model. When we abandon specifics, and attempt to think of reality in the abstract, we almost always think of what amounts not to reality but to a hypothetical, unknown, perfect model of reality.

---

[1] with Alfred Habdank Skarbek Korzybski being the first to put it just that way

Tags: modeling, modelling, models, reality, representation

This entry was posted and is filed under commentary, epistemology, philosophy, public. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.