{"id":7884,"date":"2015-10-28T01:28:26","date_gmt":"2015-10-28T09:28:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=7884"},"modified":"2015-10-29T08:06:52","modified_gmt":"2015-10-29T16:06:52","slug":"tearing-off-the-mask","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=7884","title":{"rendered":"Tearing off the Masks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I've read that Anonymous has found the names of about a thousand members of the Ku Klux Klan, and is preparing to release them.<\/p> <p>I'm hoping that none of the 10 other people in this nation with the same first and last name as I are members, because it could be Hell for the rest of us.  I'm also hoping that Anonymous doesn't add names of people whom it dislikes, especially as I might be amongst them.<\/p> <p><a href=\"?p=5608\">A few years ago, I challenged their attack on <\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a>.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a> was a journalistic enterprise, focussing on issues of global politics (including military action) and security, and publishing both free content and content that required a paid subscription.  Some at Anonymous were sure that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a> were, effectively, a criminal undertaking because<\/p> <ul><li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a> communicated off-the-record with policy wonks and with state officials (as did and do <em>almost every other major journalistic enterprise<\/em> and many of the minor journalistic enterprises); and<\/li> <li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a> expressed opinions with which Anonymous vehemently disagreed.<\/li><\/ul> <p>So Anonymous stole e.mail, e.mail addresses, and credit-card information from the Stratfor servers.  If one had so much as subscribed to a free newsletter from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a>, then one's e.mail address was made public, and one was subjected to hoax e.mail from Anonymous.  Many who had simply paid for something from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a> had their credit card information used to make contributions to charitable organizations (each of which then had to spend resources on returning the stolen money, at a net loss).<\/p> <p>The e.mail itself was given to <a href=\"http:\/\/wikileaks.org\/\">WikiLeaks<\/a>, which processed it with the help of other journalistic institutions.  Some of these institutions shamelessly used the stolen information to their own advantage, though it didn't provide evidence of wrong-doing by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a>.  Indeed, after almost four years, <em>no evidence of criminal wrong-doing has ever been presented<\/em>.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stratfor.com\/\"><abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Strategic Forecasting, Inc.\">Stratfor<\/abbr><\/a>'s greatest sin was <em>gross incompetence<\/em> in the field of security.<\/p> <p>None of the major media outlets has drawn attention to the point that the supposed end that was to justify Anonymous's means was not met.  They have been virtually silent about this attack on journalistic freedom.  That's because, as I suggested in <a href=\"?p=5608\">my entry of some years ago<\/a>, these outlets are themselves afraid of being attacked by Anonymous.<\/p> <p>Journalists are fond of seeing their profession as brave.  Well, there truly are some brave journalists in this world, but they're in a minority, and the rest don't deserve to see themselves as heroes for keeping company with that minority.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"I've read that Anonymous has found the names of about a thousand members of the Ku Klux Klan, and is preparing to release them. I'm hoping that none of the 10 other people in this nation with the same first and last name as I are members, because it could be Hell for the rest [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,117,318,9,104,4],"tags":[1076,807,1077,1078,392,806,1079,1080,1085,1086,182,1081],"class_list":["post-7884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary","category-communication","category-ethics-philosophy","category-ideology-philosophy","category-news","category-public","tag-anonymous","tag-censorship","tag-crackers","tag-cracking","tag-freedom-of-expression","tag-freedom-of-speech","tag-hackers","tag-hacking","tag-hacktivism","tag-hacktivists","tag-journalism","tag-journalists"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7884"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7884\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}