{"id":6482,"date":"2014-07-13T23:12:27","date_gmt":"2014-07-14T07:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=6482"},"modified":"2014-07-13T23:21:11","modified_gmt":"2014-07-14T07:21:11","slug":"second-rejection-and-third-attempt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=6482","title":{"rendered":"Second Rejection and Third Attempt"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The second journal to which I submitted my brief article quickly rejected it (on 11 July) as being unsuited to their readership, and suggested that <q>it may be that your work would be better directed to a journal specialising on statistical theory, or foundations\/philosophy<\/q>. (The journal to which I submitted arguably <em>is<\/em> one of statistical theory; but it leans heavily towards <em>review<\/em> rather than towards <em>innovation<\/em>.)<\/p> <p>As 13 July neared its end, I submitted to yet another journal.  This time, I'm pretty sure that I'm playing a long-shot, but a rejection should come very <em>quickly<\/em> if it comes, the paper would get relative many readers if were published there, and people in and around my field would be impressed; so I think that the gamble is a good one.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The second journal to which I submitted my brief article quickly rejected it (on 11 July) as being unsuited to their readership, and suggested that it may be that your work would be better directed to a journal specialising on statistical theory, or foundations\/philosophy. (The journal to which I submitted arguably is one of statistical [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,720,5,4],"tags":[445,446],"class_list":["post-6482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-epistemology","category-personal","category-public","tag-papers","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6482\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}