{"id":4766,"date":"2011-04-30T00:03:51","date_gmt":"2011-04-30T08:03:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=4766"},"modified":"2011-04-30T00:09:23","modified_gmt":"2011-04-30T08:09:23","slug":"a-well-expressed-thought","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=4766","title":{"rendered":"A Well-Expressed Thought"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>But to assume from the superiority of Galilean principles in the sciences of inanimate nature that they <em>must<\/em> provide the model for the sciences of animate behaviour is to make a speculative leap, not to enunciate a necessary conclusion.<\/blockquote> <div style=\"padding-left: 50% ; padding-right: auto ;\">Charles Taylor<br \/><cite>The Explanation of Behaviour<\/cite><br \/>Pt I Ch I &#167; 4<br \/>terminal sentence<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"But to assume from the superiority of Galilean principles in the sciences of inanimate nature that they must provide the model for the sciences of animate behaviour is to make a speculative leap, not to enunciate a necessary conclusion. Charles TaylorThe Explanation of BehaviourPt I Ch I &#167; 4terminal sentence","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,720,4],"tags":[299,994,992,993],"class_list":["post-4766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-epistemology","category-public","tag-decision-theory","tag-explanation","tag-human-action","tag-teleology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4766\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}