{"id":2035,"date":"2009-08-30T11:54:14","date_gmt":"2009-08-30T19:54:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=2035"},"modified":"2009-09-14T16:15:39","modified_gmt":"2009-09-15T00:15:39","slug":"urkh-does-not-fit-the-general-readership","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=2035","title":{"rendered":"<span style=\"font-style: italic ;\">Urkh!<\/span> <q>does not fit the general readership<\/q>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"?p=1949\">My latest submission of my paper<\/a>, to a yet more specialized journal, has met with a fate similar to that of my previous submissions: <blockquote style=\"font-size: smaller ;\">The advisory editor suggests that the paper does not fit the general readership of <span style=\"font-style: italic ;\">&#91;this journal&#93;<\/span> (see his short report below).<\/blockquote> That advisory editor writes <blockquote style=\"font-size: smaller ;\">I suggest to the author to submit his paper, which certainly deserves an outlet, to more specialistic journals<\/blockquote> and then recommends two in particular.  So I will review the guidelines for each, and try to decide to which of them I will make my next submission.  I take some solace in the fact that, while <a href=\"http:\/\/www.praxiologic.com\/economics\/papers\/CoinFlip.pdf\">my paper<\/a> is indeed being rejected, editors are suggesting that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.praxiologic.com\/economics\/papers\/CoinFlip.pdf\">it<\/a> truly ought to be published in a respected academic journal.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"My latest submission of my paper, to a yet more specialized journal, has met with a fate similar to that of my previous submissions: The advisory editor suggests that the paper does not fit the general readership of &#91;this journal&#93; (see his short report below). That advisory editor writes I suggest to the author to [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,36,5,4],"tags":[299,445,446],"class_list":["post-2035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-economics","category-personal","category-public","tag-decision-theory","tag-papers","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2035","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2035"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2035\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2035"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2035"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2035"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}