{"id":1938,"date":"2009-07-22T15:40:04","date_gmt":"2009-07-22T23:40:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=1938"},"modified":"2009-09-21T19:25:56","modified_gmt":"2009-09-22T03:25:56","slug":"again-with-the-too-specialized","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=1938","title":{"rendered":"Again with the <q>Too Specialized<\/q>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Good L_rd!<\/em>  In response to my submission, the editor of the third journal responded <blockquote style=\"font-size: smaller ;\">While I find the paper interesting, I feel it is too specialized a topic for a general audience journal such as <span style=\"font-style: italic ;\">&#91;ours&#93;<\/span>.<\/blockquote><\/p> <p>The thing is that, unlike the previous two journals, which cover economics in general, this is a journal of micro&euml;conomics.  Yet, <a href=\"?p=1855\">like the editor of the previous journal<\/a>, the editor still feels that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.praxiologic.com\/economics\/papers\/CoinFlip.pdf\">the paper<\/a> is too specialized for the audience. (<a href=\"?p=1934\">Though, as noted, this third journal was recommended by that editor of the second.<\/a>)<\/p> <p>I need to figure-out just who <em>won't<\/em> think <a href=\"http:\/\/www.praxiologic.com\/economics\/papers\/CoinFlip.pdf\">it<\/a> too specialized.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Good L_rd! In response to my submission, the editor of the third journal responded While I find the paper interesting, I feel it is too specialized a topic for a general audience journal such as &#91;ours&#93;. The thing is that, unlike the previous two journals, which cover economics in general, this is a journal of [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,36,5,4],"tags":[299,445,446],"class_list":["post-1938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-economics","category-personal","category-public","tag-decision-theory","tag-papers","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1938\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}