{"id":134,"date":"2008-05-23T11:58:10","date_gmt":"2008-05-23T19:58:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=134"},"modified":"2009-09-23T19:39:33","modified_gmt":"2009-09-24T03:39:33","slug":"same-as-the-old-boss","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=134","title":{"rendered":"Same as the Old Boss"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"padding: 1em;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.openmarket.org\/2008\/05\/23\/fingerprint-registry-in-housing-bill\/\"><q>Fingerprint Registry in Housing Bill!!!<\/q> by John Berlau at OpenMarket.org<\/a> <blockquote>[E]arlier this week, a measure creating a federal fingerprint registry totally unrelated to national security passed a U.S. Senate committee almost without notice. The legislation would require thousands of individuals working even tangentially in the mortgage and real estate industries &mdash; and not suspected of anything &mdash; to send their prints to the feds. The database and fingerprint mandates were tucked into housing and foreclosure assistance bills that on Tuesday passed the Senate Banking Committee by a vote of 19-2.<\/blockquote><\/div> <blockquote><a href=\"http:\/\/banking.senate.gov\/public\/_files\/ManagersAmendmenttoGSEBill.pdf\">Managers Amendment to GSE Bill<\/a><\/blockquote>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Fingerprint Registry in Housing Bill!!! by John Berlau at OpenMarket.org [E]arlier this week, a measure creating a federal fingerprint registry totally unrelated to national security passed a U.S. Senate committee almost without notice. The legislation would require thousands of individuals working even tangentially in the mortgage and real estate industries &mdash; and not suspected of [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[104,4],"tags":[211,212,213],"class_list":["post-134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-public","tag-fingerprinting","tag-personal-data","tag-police-states"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=134"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/134\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}