{"id":12341,"date":"2024-02-22T00:09:54","date_gmt":"2024-02-22T08:09:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=12341"},"modified":"2024-03-11T18:08:01","modified_gmt":"2024-03-12T01:08:01","slug":"the-sixth-transom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=12341","title":{"rendered":"The Sixth Transom"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Shortly before mid-night on 21 February, I submitted a copy of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.praxiologic.com\/economics\/papers\/Sraffa.pdf\">my paper on Sraffa<\/a> to yet another journal.<\/p> <p>The submission software of the previous journal still lists <a href=\"https:\/\/www.praxiologic.com\/economics\/papers\/Sraffa.pdf\">my paper<\/a> with a status of <q>Submitted to Journal<\/q>.  Perhaps they don't have a mechanism in place for removing an entry when an author has responded to abuse by withdrawing work at that stage; perhaps someone is hoping to avoid the attention of a manager with greater authority.  I've received no further communication from the publisher, nor any from the editor.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Shortly before mid-night on 21 February, I submitted a copy of my paper on Sraffa to yet another journal. The submission software of the previous journal still lists my paper with a status of Submitted to Journal. Perhaps they don't have a mechanism in place for removing an entry when an author has responded to [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,36,4],"tags":[1317,445,1316,1395,1318,446],"class_list":["post-12341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-economics","category-public","tag-neo-ricardianism","tag-papers","tag-piero-sraffa","tag-post-keynesianism","tag-sraffa","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12341"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12354,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12341\/revisions\/12354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}