{"id":11241,"date":"2020-02-20T20:26:26","date_gmt":"2020-02-21T04:26:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=11241"},"modified":"2020-02-20T20:26:26","modified_gmt":"2020-02-21T04:26:26","slug":"published","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=11241","title":{"rendered":"Published"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On 20 February 2020, a year to-the-day after I submitted my paper <q>Formal Qualitiative Probability<\/q> to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/review-of-symbolic-logic\"><cite>The Review of Symbolic Logic<\/cite><\/a> and nearly five months after I was notified that a revised version had been accepted, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1755020319000480\">Cambridge University Press published the manuscript on-line<\/a>.<\/p> <p>(I believe that an unchanging <abbr  title=\"Digital Object Identifier\">DOI<\/abbr> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1755020319000480\"><q>10.1017\/S1755020319000480<\/q><\/a> will be used for whatever is the latest version of the article, as it is type-set for paper publication and eventually assigned to a specific issue.)<\/p> <p>This work was badly treated across journals of philosophy.  Regardless of whether any of my future work is perhaps best regarded as philosophic, I will henceforth avoid submitting to such journals.<\/p> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"On 20 February 2020, a year to-the-day after I submitted my paper Formal Qualitiative Probability to The Review of Symbolic Logic and nearly five months after I was notified that a revised version had been accepted, Cambridge University Press published the manuscript on-line. (I believe that an unchanging DOI 10.1017\/S1755020319000480 will be used for whatever [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,117,36,720,5,4],"tags":[445],"class_list":["post-11241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary","category-communication","category-economics","category-epistemology","category-personal","category-public","tag-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11241\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}