{"id":11159,"date":"2019-12-03T20:49:56","date_gmt":"2019-12-04T04:49:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=11159"},"modified":"2020-01-19T22:34:51","modified_gmt":"2020-01-20T06:34:51","slug":"a-new-projectionist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=11159","title":{"rendered":"A New Projectionist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am in the process of relocating video embedded in entries to this &#39;blog. (Only a few and rather old entries have such content.)<\/p> <p>My experiences with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a> have been unhappy.  It routinely messed-up the synchronization of sound with image for my content.  Without a ready appeal process, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a> disabled videos that made <span style=\"font-style: italic ;\">fair use<\/span> of copyrighted content.  Although my content has not been affected by the political bias of <a href=\"https:\/\/abc.xyz\/\">Alphabet <abbr class=\"noshrink\" title=\"Incorporated\">Inc.<\/abbr><\/a> (the parent company of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a>), it was grossly unethical for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a> to get people to cluster at their site by representing itself as an honest broker, and then to bring a bias to bear.  And, when <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a> disabled a video for one reason or for another, the embedding code responded inappropriately.<\/p> <p>For now, I am moving most or all of my video content to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bitchute.com\/\">BitChute<\/a>; I don't know that my content will remain there.  But <em>any<\/em> host that does not apply an ideologic filter will attract a disproportionate share of content from those penalized by the biases of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a>; the main-stream of the media (who <em>share<\/em> the ideologic bias of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a>) will seize upon this disproportion to claim or to insinuate that the host and those who use it are <em>sympathetic<\/em> with the more repellent of those filtered-out by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/\">YouTube<\/a>.  The sophistry will be evident to all but the rather stupid, but a much larger share of people will r&ocirc;le-play as if the argument were sound.<\/p> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"I am in the process of relocating video embedded in entries to this &#39;blog. (Only a few and rather old entries have such content.) My experiences with YouTube have been unhappy. It routinely messed-up the synchronization of sound with image for my content. Without a ready appeal process, YouTube disabled videos that made fair use [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,6,69,4],"tags":[1548,1549,35,182,1547],"class_list":["post-11159","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog-meta","category-commentary","category-information-technology","category-public","tag-alphabet","tag-bitchute","tag-google","tag-journalism","tag-youtube"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11159"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11159\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}