{"id":11087,"date":"2019-08-13T21:15:14","date_gmt":"2019-08-14T04:15:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=11087"},"modified":"2019-08-13T21:21:11","modified_gmt":"2019-08-14T04:21:11","slug":"continued-waiting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=11087","title":{"rendered":"Continued Waiting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Four weeks after <a href=\"?p=11078\">I submitted a revision of my paper on probability, along with additional responses to each of the referee reports<\/a>, I am still waiting on word from the journal.  The website reporting on the submission is not particularly instructive.  Under the heading <q>Status<\/q> the report says <q>02\/20\/19 Waiting<\/q>; under the heading <q>Last Action<\/q> the report reads <q>Referee Assignment Request<\/q>.  My guess is that a request <em>to<\/em> a specific referee candidate has been made <em>by<\/em> the handling editor.  I don't think that the report will be or has been updated to reflect declined requests; it might be updated when outstanding requests have been accepted.<\/p> <p>Evidently, a swift rejection did not result from my explaining that the first pair of referee reports involved some major errors on the parts of those referees.  But I am not made to feel particularly hopeful; it is pathological that the paper has not already been properly reviewed.<\/p> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Four weeks after I submitted a revision of my paper on probability, along with additional responses to each of the referee reports, I am still waiting on word from the journal. The website reporting on the submission is not particularly instructive. Under the heading Status the report says 02\/20\/19 Waiting; under the heading Last Action [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,5,4],"tags":[445],"class_list":["post-11087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication","category-personal","category-public","tag-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11087"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11087\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}