{"id":10255,"date":"2018-03-16T21:36:28","date_gmt":"2018-03-17T04:36:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=10255"},"modified":"2018-03-16T21:36:28","modified_gmt":"2018-03-17T04:36:28","slug":"three-weeks-and-counting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?p=10255","title":{"rendered":"Three Weeks and Counting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"?p=10217\">The journal to which I submitted my paper on qualitative probability on 20 February<\/a> has multiple editors.  On 23 February (by a European clock) it was listed as assigned to one.  Since then, the listing has remained unchanged; unless it receives a desk rejection (<q>Editor has a decision<\/q>), the next classification will be <q>Reviewers Assigned<\/q>, to be followed by <q>Under Review<\/q>.<\/p> <p>It is not impossible that it should be given a desk rejection even after more than three weeks in the hands of an editor, but I think that such a rejection is unlikely.  <em>The editor seems to have read or be reading the paper<\/em>, and to have recognized that it indeed is properly submitted to a journal concerned with philosophy of science, <a href=\"?p=10155\">unlike the editor at the first journal to which I submitted it<\/a>.<\/p> <p>It is fairly common for it to take a month or a bit more to find reviewers.  It may be harder to find reviewers for my paper than it would be to find reviewers for a typical submission.<\/p> ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The journal to which I submitted my paper on qualitative probability on 20 February has multiple editors. On 23 February (by a European clock) it was listed as assigned to one. Since then, the listing has remained unchanged; unless it receives a desk rejection (Editor has a decision), the next classification will be Reviewers Assigned, [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,4],"tags":[445],"class_list":["post-10255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personal","category-public","tag-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10255"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10255\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}