{"id":8015,"date":"2016-01-05T07:51:24","date_gmt":"2016-01-05T15:51:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?page_id=8015"},"modified":"2016-01-05T22:41:42","modified_gmt":"2016-01-06T06:41:42","slug":"money-101-part-5","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/?page_id=8015","title":{"rendered":"Money 101 &mdash; part 5"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 style=\"font-style: italic ;\">Previous Sections<\/h3> <p style=\"text-align: center ; font-style: italic ;\">&#91;To read a previous section, click on its section heading in this list.&#93;<\/p> <ul><li><a href=\"?page_id=7989#origin\"><q>The Nature and Origin of Money<\/q><\/a><\/li> <li><a href=\"?page_id=7993#equation\"><q>The Equation of Exchange and the Price Level<\/q><\/a><\/li> <li><a href=\"?page_id=7993#inflation\"><q>The Inflationary Process<\/q><\/a><\/li> <li><a href=\"?page_id=7998#commodityBase\"><q>Commodity-Based Money<\/q><\/a><\/li> <li><a href=\"?page_id=7998#nationalization\"><q>The Nationalization of Money and Fiat Money<\/q><\/a><\/li> <li><a href=\"?page_id=8009#partialReserveFraud\"><q>Partial-Reserve Issuance &mdash; the Charge of Fraud<\/q><\/a><\/li><\/ul> <h3><a name=\"inequality\">The Effects of Inequality in the Accumulation of Money<\/a><\/h3> <p><a href=\"?page_id=7989#locke\">As noted above<\/a>, John Locke argued that one of the virtues of using durable money was that it did not <em>decay<\/em> when used as a store of value.  But warehousing even a durable money might entail <em>waste<\/em>.  If the money is an ordinary durable commodity, then what can be wasted is <em>time<\/em>; the commodity might otherwise have been put to <em>productive use<\/em> while it were stored.<\/p> <p>Locke seems to have sensed this problem, because he wrote as if <em>gold<\/em> had no meaningful value other than by an agreement amongst men.  This was not correct in his day &mdash; gold had various applications and potential applications, which were the <em>foundation<\/em> of its value as money &mdash; and it is still less true in our own. (For example, gold is used in the production of electronics.).<\/p> <p>But, once <em>notes<\/em> begin to be used as money, literally holding money can correspond to holding <em>slips of paper<\/em>; and if there is partial-reserve issuance, then the corresponding warehousing of some commodity serving as a base is reduced.  And if the money is by <em>fiat<\/em>, then the warehousing of a commodity is no longer involved at all.<\/p> <p>Yet there is a <em>populist<\/em> view that, somehow, for some party to accumulate a vast amount of money is a <em>drag on economic production<\/em>, from the money not being <em>used<\/em>.<\/p> <p>The first thing to understand is that, when a person or an association accumulates a large amount of money, it is almost never <em>warehoused<\/em> <span style=\"font-style: italic ;\">&agrave; la<\/span> Scrooge McDuck; instead, it is <em>deposited with a financial intermediary<\/em> (such as a bank), and that intermediary <em>loans<\/em> the money to those who will spend it on resources for production or for consumption &mdash; <em>fundamentally<\/em> what would have happened had the <em>accumulation<\/em> been dispersed amongst a wider range of persons.  Indeed, those who accumulate large sums of money do so by using resources in a manner to increase their accumulations,<span style=\"vertical-align: top; font-size: smaller ;\">&#91;17&#93;<\/span> and are therefore typically going to <em>warehouse<\/em> a smaller <em>proportion<\/em> of their money than those who are less successful accumulators.  So, <em>if<\/em> warehousing money were a meaningful problem, then thwarting these successful accumulators would tend to <em>worsen<\/em> that problem!<\/p> <p>If some person or group of persons actually warehoused a large sum of money, what they have done is <em>to reduce the supply of money in circulation<\/em> (<var>M<\/var>).  If a <em>huge<\/em> proportion of the money supply began to be warehoused, then <em>a general decline in prices would be observed<\/em>, as this money were withdrawn from markets in which it were previously spent. (A decline in the money supply is not the only thing that might have this effect, but if we don't observe this effect then we know that the share of the money supply being warehoused <em>isn't<\/em> hugely increasing.) The monetary unit would serve less well as the <span style=\"font-style: italic ;\">unit of account<\/span> than if prices were generally stable, so a decline in prices would cre&auml;te misallocations.  If a huge share of the money supply were for some reason <em>suddenly<\/em> warehoused, there would be a huge economic downturn caused by the misallocations resulting from prices being too high for the amount of money remaining in circulation, until price adjustments had been made.  If the warehousing (gradual or sudden) plateaued at some new proportion, then once prices had re&euml;quilibrated, it would have no further effect.<\/p> <p>But if the money were subsequently put <em>back<\/em> into circulation (as it might if the state forced people to reduce their warehousing of money), then the effects on prices would be reversed and <em>misallocation would return<\/em> because, with prices now increasing, again the monetary unit would work less well as the unit of account.  If the reduction were relatively <em>rapid<\/em>, then again there would be an economic downturn.<\/p> <p>(As noted in a prior section, when a money is based upon a commodity, the commodity used as money is shifted from other use when the value of money is increasing, and shifted to other use when the value of money is decreasing; and there would of course be some of this re&auml;llocation in response to the price-effects of changes in what share of money were warehoused, either as notes or as the commodity itself.)<\/p> <p>In sum,<\/p> <ul><li><em>accumulating<\/em> money isn't the same as <em>warehousing<\/em> money,<\/li> <li>people who are effective in accumulating money are less likely than other folk to warehouse money,<\/li> <li>the price effects of an increase in warehousing aren't being observed, and<\/li> <li>forcing warehoused money back into circulation would be injurious to the economy.<\/li><\/ul> <hr width=\"50%\" align=\"left\" \/> <p><span style=\"vertical-align: top; font-size: smaller ;\">&#91;17&#93;<\/span> Very simply, a <em>pile<\/em> of money does not <em>grow<\/em> if someone simply <em>sits<\/em> upon it.<\/p> <p style=\"text-align: right ;\"><a href=\"?p=8036#respond\">Comments<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Previous Sections &#91;To read a previous section, click on its section heading in this list.&#93; The Nature and Origin of Money The Equation of Exchange and the Price Level The Inflationary Process Commodity-Based Money The Nationalization of Money and Fiat Money Partial-Reserve Issuance &mdash; the Charge of Fraud The Effects of Inequality in the Accumulation [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-8015","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8015","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8015"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8015\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oeconomist.com\/blogs\/daniel\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}